4.5 Article

Deeply conserved synteny resolves early events in vertebrate evolution

期刊

NATURE ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION
卷 4, 期 6, 页码 820-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41559-020-1156-z

关键词

-

资金

  1. Austrian Science Fund [P30686-B29, P32190]
  2. Fondation ARC pour la Recherche sur le Cancer [PDF20150602803]
  3. Academia Sinica [AS-98-CDA-L06]
  4. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [104-2923-B-001-002-MY3, 105-2628-B-001-003-MY3]
  5. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation [GBMF3804]
  6. US National Human Genome Research Institute [T32HG000047]
  7. Marthella Foskett Brown Chair in Biological Sciences
  8. Office of Science of the US Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  9. OIST
  10. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P32190] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although it is widely believed that early vertebrate evolution was shaped by ancient whole-genome duplications, the number, timing and mechanism of these events remain elusive. Here, we infer the history of vertebrates through genomic comparisons with a new chromosome-scale sequence of the invertebrate chordate amphioxus. We show how the karyotypes of amphioxus and diverse vertebrates are derived from 17 ancestral chordate linkage groups (and 19 ancestral bilaterian groups) by fusion, rearrangement and duplication. We resolve two distinct ancient duplications based on patterns of chromosomal conserved synteny. All extant vertebrates share the first duplication, which occurred in the mid/late Cambrian by autotetraploidization (that is, direct genome doubling). In contrast, the second duplication is found only in jawed vertebrates and occurred in the mid-late Ordovician by allotetraploidization (that is, genome duplication following interspecific hybridization) from two now-extinct progenitors. This complex genomic history parallels the diversification of vertebrate lineages in the fossil record. Genomic comparisons with a new amphioxus chromosome-scale genome assembly reveal details of the early evolution of vertebrate genomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据