4.1 Article

Conceptualisation of the therapeutic alliance in physiotherapy: is it adequate?

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2020.102131

关键词

Therapeutic alliance; Biopsychosocial model; Physiotherapy; Concept analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: The Therapeutic Alliance (TA) is an emerging concept within physiotherapy practice, reflecting the ongoing paradigm shift from a biomedical- (BMM) towards a biopsychosocial model (BPSM) of care. Current conceptual understanding of the TA is commonly based on Bordin's (1979) definition, developed within a psychotherapy context. A concept analysis was conducted in order to provide conceptual clarity of the TA within physiotherapy literature. Method: An evolutionary method of concept analysis was followed. An extensive literature search was conducted, and eligible articles were submitted to inductive, semantic thematic analysis. Findings: A total of 14 articles were included within this concept analysis. 5 master attribute themes, and 4 corresponding sub-themes were identified following thematic analysis. The master attribute themes were: 'Seeing the person', 'Sharing the journey', 'Communication', 'Therapeutic space' and 'Fostering autonomy'. The 4 Subthemes were: 'Giving of self, 'Legitimising the experience', 'Physiotherapist characteristics matter' and 'Interpersonal collaboration'. Conclusion: A heuristic interpretation of the TA within a physiotherapy context is offered. The TA is a dynamic construct within the clinical encounter and is influenced reciprocally between the person seeking care and the physiotherapist by biological, social and psychological contributing factors. 'Communication' may act as a catalyst in operationalising the TA in a physiotherapy context. Continued efforts are needed in physiotherapy education and training in both enhancing theoretical awareness of the role of the TA within physiotherapy practice, as well as guidance on its implementation in clinical practice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据