4.7 Article

Experimental Treatment with Favipiravir for COVID-19: An Open-Label Control Study

期刊

ENGINEERING
卷 6, 期 10, 页码 1192-1198

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.eng.2020.03.007

关键词

Favipiravir; COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; Antiviral therapy; Open-label nonrandomized control study

资金

  1. National Science and Technology Major Project [2017ZX10204401, 2018ZX10711001, 2017ZX10103011, 2018ZX09711003, 2020YFC0841700]
  2. Sanming Project of Medicine in Shenzhen [SZSM201412003, SZSM201512005]
  3. Shenzhen Science and Technology Research and Development Project [202002073000001]
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2019M660836]
  5. Guangdong Special Fund for Science and Technology Innovation Strategy in 2020
  6. Science and Technology Emergency Project for the prevention and control of the novel coronavirus by the Department of Science and Technology of Guangdong Province [2020B111105001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is currently an outbreak of respiratory disease caused by a novel coronavirus. The virus has been named severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and the disease it causes has been named coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). More than 16% of patients developed acute respiratory distress syndrome, and the fatality ratio was 1%-2%. No specific treatment has been reported. Herein, we examined the effects of favipiravir (FPV) versus lopinavir (LPV)/ritonavir (RTV) for the treatment of COVID-19. Patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 who received oral FPV (Day 1: 1600 mg twice daily; Days 2-14: 600 mg twice daily) plus interferon (IFN)-alpha by aerosol inhalation (5 million international unit (IU) twice daily) were included in the FPV arm of this study, whereas patients who were treated with LPV/RTV (Days 1-14: 400 mg/100 mg twice daily) plus IFN-alpha by aerosol inhalation (5 million IU twice daily) were included in the control arm. Changes in chest computed tomography (CT), viral clearance, and drug safety were compared between the two groups. For the 35 patients enrolled in the FPV arm and the 45 patients in the control arm, all baseline characteristics were comparable between the two arms. A shorter viral clearance median time was found for the FPV arm versus the control arm (4 d (interquartile range (IQR): 2.5-9) versus 11 d (IQR: 8-13), P < 0.001). The FPV arm also showed significant improvement in chest CT compared with the control arm, with an improvement rate of 91.43% versus 62.22% (P = 0.004). After adjustment for potential confounders, the FPV arm also showed a significantly higher improvement rate in chest CT. Multivariable Cox regression showed that FPV was independently associated with faster viral clearance. In addition, fewer adverse events were found in the FPV arm than in the control arm. In this open-label before-after controlled study, FPV showed better therapeutic responses on COVID-19 in terms of disease progression and viral clearance. These preliminary clinical results provide useful information of treatments for SARS-CoV-2 infection. (c) 2020 THE AUTHORS. Published by Elsevier LTD on behalf of Chinese Academy of Engineering and Higher Education Press Limited Company. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据