4.4 Article

Immunogenicity of Inactivated Varicella Zoster Vaccine in Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients and Patients With Solid or Hematologic Cancer

期刊

OPEN FORUM INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 7, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa172

关键词

cell-mediated immunity; humoral immunity; immunocompromised adults; immunogenicity; inactivated zoster vaccine

资金

  1. Merck Sharp Dohme Corp.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. In phase 3 trials, inactivated varicella zoster virus (VZV) vaccine (ZV(IN)) was well tolerated and efficacious against herpes zoster (HZ) in autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (auto-HSCT) recipients and patients with solid tumor malignancies receiving chemotherapy (STMc) but did not reduce HZ incidence in patients with hematologic malignancies (hMs). Here, we describe ZV(IN) immunogenicity from these studies. Methods. Patients were randomized to ZV(IN )or placebo (4 doses). Immunogenicity was assessed by glycoprotein enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (gpELISA) and VZV interferon (IFN)-gamma enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) assay in patients receiving all 4 doses without developing HZ at the time of blood sampling. Results. Estimated geometric mean fold rise ratios (ZV(IN)/placebo) by gpELISA and IFN-gamma ELISPOT similar to 28 days post-dose 4 were 2.02 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.53-2.67) and 5.41 (95% CI, 3.60-8.12) in auto-HSCT recipients; 1.88 (95% CI, 1.79-1.98) and 2.10 (95% CI, 1.69-2.62) in patients with STMc; and not assessed and 2.35 (95% CI, 1.81-3.05) in patients with HM. Conclusions. ZV(IN) immunogenicity was directionally consistent with clinical efficacy in auto-HSCT recipients and patients with STMc even though HZ protection and VZV immunity were not statistically correlated. Despite a lack of clinical efficacy in patients with HM, ZV(IN) immunogenicity was observed in this population. Immunological results did not predict vaccine efficacy in these 3 populations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据