4.6 Article

Occurrence and multiple-level ecological risk assessment of pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) in two shallow lakes of China

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES EUROPE
卷 32, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1186/s12302-020-00346-1

关键词

PPCPs; Concentration; Multiple-level; Risk assessment; China; Tai Lake; Baiyangdian Lake; Probabilistic; Asia

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41807400, 41977364, 41521003, 41630645]
  2. National Major S&T Program for Water Pollution Control and Treatment [2017ZX07301-005]
  3. Canada Research Chairs Program of the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  4. Beijing outstanding talent training program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundManagement of pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) in the environment has become a social issue. In the present study, concentrations of 140 PPCPs at 20 sites in Baiyangdian Lake and Tai Lake from 2016 to 2017 were analyzed by ultra performance liquid chromatography mass spectrometer (UPLC-MS). Risk quotients (RQ) were calculated for each detected chemical at all sites and prioritization indices (PI), based on maximum RQ, were calculated. To assess the risk of chemicals that identified high priority (PI>1), a more accurate method of joint probability curves (JPCs) was applied.ResultsA total of 42 PPCPs were identified and quantified detected in the two lakes, with maximum concentrations ranging from 0.04 to 889 ng/L. Among these, seven PPCPs were identified as high or moderate-risk pollutants for at least one site, 3 in Tai Lake and 5 in Baiyangdian Lake. Carbamazepine posed significant ecological risk at all 20 sites, such that more attention should be paid to that drug. Based on results of the JPCs, sulfamethoxazole, caffeine, diethyltoluamide, and carbamazepine were categorized as high or intermediate risks.ConclusionOccurrences and distributions of PPCPs were different in the two lakes. Multiple-level risk assessment from simple to more complex was appropriate in chemical risk management.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据