4.6 Article

A Matter of Choice: Inhibition of c-Rel Shifts Neuronal to Oligodendroglial Fate in Human Stem Cells

期刊

CELLS
卷 9, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cells9041037

关键词

NF-kappa B-c-REL; oligodendroglial fate shift; pentoxifylline; MBP; survival

资金

  1. DAAD Regierungsstipendium Uruguay - ANII scholarship [91554135, POS_EXT_2013_1_13498]
  2. University of Bielefeld
  3. Bielefeld University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The molecular mechanisms underlying fate decisions of human neural stem cells (hNSCs) between neurogenesis and gliogenesis are critical during neuronal development and neurodegenerative diseases. Despite its crucial role in the murine nervous system, the potential role of the transcription factor NF-kappa B in the neuronal development of hNSCs is poorly understood. Here, we analyzed NF-kappa B subunit distribution during glutamatergic differentiation of hNSCs originating from neural crest-derived stem cells. We observed several peaks of specific NF-kappa B subunits. The most prominent nuclear peak was shown by c-REL subunit during a period of 2-5 days after differentiation onset. Furthermore, c-REL inhibition with pentoxifylline (PTXF) resulted in a complete shift towards oligodendroglial fate, as demonstrated by the presence of OLIG2(+)/O4(+)-oligodendrocytes, which showed PDGFR alpha, NG2 and MBP at the transcript level. In addition c-REL impairment further produced a significant decrease in neuronal survival. Transplantation of PTXF-treated predifferentiated hNSCs into an ex vivo oxidative-stress-mediated demyelination model of mouse organotypic cerebellar slices further led to integration in the white matter and differentiation into MBP+ oligodendrocytes, validating their functionality and therapeutic potential. In summary, we present a human cellular model of neuronal differentiation exhibiting a novel essential function of NF-kappa B-c-REL in fate choice between neurogenesis and oligodendrogenesis which will potentially be relevant for multiple sclerosis and schizophrenia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据