4.6 Article

Nanoemulsions as Delivery Systems for Poly-Chemotherapy Aiming at Melanoma Treatment

期刊

CANCERS
卷 12, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cancers12051198

关键词

nanoemulsions; Intralipid((R)); temozolomide; rapamycin; bevacizumab; melanoma

类别

资金

  1. Universita degli Studi di Torino: Ricerca Locale 2016-2017
  2. Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Universita e della Ricerca: FFABR 2017
  3. Fondazione CRT [2019.2252]
  4. Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro [IG 20714]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims: Advanced melanoma is characterized by poor outcome. Despite the number of treatments having been increased over the last decade, current pharmacological strategies are only partially effective. Therefore, the improvement of the current systemic therapy is worthy of investigation. Methods: a nanotechnology-based poly-chemotherapy was tested at preclinical level. Temozolomide, rapamycin, and bevacizumab were co-loaded as injectable nanoemulsions for total parenteral nutrition (Intralipid((R))), due to suitable devices, and preliminarily tested in vitro on human and mouse cell models and in vivo on the B16-F10 melanoma mouse model. Results: Drug combination was efficiently loaded in the liquid lipid matrix of Intralipid((R)), including bevacizumab monoclonal antibody, leading to a fast internalization in tumour cells. An increased cytotoxicity towards melanoma cells, as well as an improved inhibition of tumour relapse, migration, and angiogenesis were demonstrated in cell models for the Intralipid((R))-loaded drug combinations. In preliminary in vivo studies, the proposed approach was able to reduce tumour growth significantly, compared to controls. A relevant efficacy towards tumour angiogenesis and mitotic index was determined and immune response was involved. Conclusions: In these preliminary studies, Intralipid((R)) proved to be a safe and versatile poly-chemotherapy delivery system for advanced melanoma treatment, by acting on multiple mechanisms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据