4.6 Review

Oncobiosis and Microbial Metabolite Signaling in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

期刊

CANCERS
卷 12, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cancers12051068

关键词

pancreatic adenocarcinoma; oncobiome; microbiome; bile acids; bacterial metabolite; amino acid metabolites; polyamines; LPS; short chain fatty acid

类别

资金

  1. Hungarian Scientific Research Fund [UNKP-19-4-DE-79, K123975, PD124110, FK128387, GINOP-2.3.2-15-2016-00006, EFOP-3.6.2-16-2017-0006, K120669, NKFIH-1150-6/2019]
  2. Magyar Tudomanyos Akademia: Bolyai fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is one of the most lethal cancers in both men and women, with a median five-year survival of around 5%. Therefore, pancreatic adenocarcinoma represents an unmet medical need. Neoplastic diseases, such as pancreatic adenocarcinoma, often are associated with microbiome dysbiosis, termed oncobiosis. In pancreatic adenocarcinoma, the oral, duodenal, ductal, and fecal microbiome become dysbiotic. Furthermore, the pancreas frequently becomes colonized (by Helicobacter pylori and Malassezia, among others). The oncobiomes from long- and short-term survivors of pancreatic adenocarcinoma are different and transplantation of the microbiome from long-term survivors into animal models of pancreatic adenocarcinoma prolongs survival. The oncobiome in pancreatic adenocarcinoma modulates the inflammatory processes that drive carcinogenesis. In this review, we point out that bacterial metabolites (short chain fatty acids, secondary bile acids, polyamines, indole-derivatives, etc.) also have a role in the microbiome-driven pathogenesis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Finally, we show that bacterial metabolism and the bacterial metabolome is largely dysregulated in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The pathogenic role of additional metabolites and metabolic pathways will be identified in the near future, widening the scope of this therapeutically and diagnostically exploitable pathogenic pathway in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据