4.7 Article

Reduced-intensity transplantation for lymphomas using haploidentical related donors vs HLA-matched unrelated donors

期刊

BLOOD
卷 127, 期 7, 页码 938-947

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2015-09-671834

关键词

-

资金

  1. Public Health Service Grant/Cooperative Agreement from the National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute (NCI) [U24-CA076518]
  2. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
  3. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
  4. NHLBI [5U10HL069294]
  5. NCI
  6. Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA/US Department of Health and Human Services [DHHS]) [HHSH250201200016C]
  7. Office of Naval Research [N00014-13-1-0039, N00014-14-1-0028]
  8. Actinium Pharmaceuticals
  9. Allos Therapeutics, Inc
  10. Amgen, Inc
  11. Ariad
  12. Be the Match Foundation
  13. Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association
  14. Celgene Corporation
  15. Chimerix, Inc
  16. Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
  17. Fresenius-Biotech North America, Inc
  18. Gamida Cell Teva Joint Venture Ltd
  19. Genentech, Inc
  20. Gentium SpA
  21. Genzyme Corporation
  22. GlaxoSmithKline
  23. Health Research, Inc Roswell Park Cancer Institute
  24. HistoGenetics, Inc
  25. Incyte Corporation
  26. Jeff Gordon Children's Foundation
  27. Kiadis Pharma
  28. Leukemia & Lymphoma Society
  29. Medac GmbH
  30. Medical College of Wisconsin
  31. Merck Co, Inc
  32. Millennium: The Takeda Oncology Co
  33. Milliman USA, Inc
  34. Miltenyi Biotec, Inc
  35. National Marrow Donor Program
  36. Onyx Pharmaceuticals
  37. Optum Healthcare Solutions, Inc
  38. Osiris Therapeutics, Inc
  39. Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc
  40. Perkin Elmer, Inc
  41. Remedy Informatics
  42. Sanofi US
  43. Seattle Genetics
  44. Sigma-Tau Pharmaceuticals
  45. Soligenix, Inc
  46. St. Baldrick's Foundation
  47. StemCyte, a Global Cord Blood Therapeutics Co
  48. Stemsoft Software, Inc
  49. Swedish Orphan Biovitrum
  50. Tarix Pharmaceuticals
  51. TerumoBCT
  52. Teva Neuroscience, Inc
  53. THERAKOS, Inc
  54. University of Minnesota
  55. University of Utah
  56. Wellpoint, Inc

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We evaluated 917 adult lymphoma patients who received haploidentical (n = 185) or HLA-matched unrelated donor (URD) transplantation either with (n = 241) or without antithymocyte globulin (ATG; n = 491) following reduced-intensity conditioning regimens. Haploidentical recipients received posttransplant cyclophosphamide-based graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, whereas URD recipients received calcineurin inhibitor-based prophylaxis. Median follow-up of survivors was 3 years. The 100-day cumulative incidence of grade III-IV acute GVHD on univariate analysis was 8%, 12%, and 17% in the haploidentical, URD without ATG, and URD with ATG groups, respectively (P = .44). Corresponding 1-year rates of chronic GVHD on univariate analysis were 13%, 51%, and 33%, respectively (P < .001). On multivariate analysis, grade III-IV acute GVHD was higher in URD without ATG (P = .001), as well as URD with ATG (P = .01), relative to haploidentical transplants. Similarly, relative to haploidentical transplants, risk of chronic GVHD was higher in URD without ATG and URD with ATG (P < .0001). Cumulative incidence of relapse/progression at 3 years was 36%, 28%, and 36% in the haploidentical, URD without ATG, and URD with ATG groups, respectively (P = .07). Corresponding 3-year overall survival (OS) was 60%, 62%, and 50% in the 3 groups, respectively, with multivariate analysis showing no survival difference between URD without ATG (P = .21) or URD with ATG (P = .16), relative to haploidentical transplants. Multivariate analysis showed no difference between the 3 groups in terms of nonrelapse mortality (NRM), relapse/progression, and progression-free survival (PFS). These data suggest that reduced-intensity conditioning haploidentical transplantation with posttransplant cyclophosphamide does not compromise early survival outcomes compared with matched URD transplantation, and is associated with significantly reduced risk of chronic GVHD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据