4.7 Article

Emotion Recognition Abilities in Adults with Anorexia Nervosa are Associated with Autistic Traits

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
卷 9, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm9041057

关键词

anorexia nervosa; ASD; comorbidity; emotion recognition; attention

资金

  1. Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC)
  2. Psychiatry Research Trust
  3. Medical Research Council (MRC) [MR/S020381/1]
  4. MRC-MRF Fund [MR/R004595/1]
  5. Health Foundation [1115447]
  6. Maudsley Charity
  7. MRC [MR/S020381/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Difficulties in socio-emotional functioning are proposed to contribute to the development and maintenance of anorexia nervosa (AN). This study aimed to examine emotion recognition abilities in individuals in the acute and recovered stages of AN compared to healthy controls (HCs). A second aim was to examine whether attention to faces and comorbid psychopathology predicted emotion recognition abilities. The films expressions task was administered to 148 participants (46 AN, 51 recovered AN, 51 HC) to assess emotion recognition, during which attention to faces was recorded using eye-tracking. Comorbid psychopathology was assessed using self-report questionnaires and the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule-2nd edition (ADOS-2). No significant differences in emotion recognition abilities or attention to faces were found between groups. However, individuals with a lifetime history of AN who scored above the clinical cut-off on the ADOS-2 displayed poorer emotion recognition performance than those scoring below cut-off and HCs. ADOS-2 scores significantly predicted emotion recognition abilities while controlling for group membership and intelligence. Difficulties in emotion recognition appear to be associated with high autism spectrum disorder (ASD) traits, rather than a feature of AN. Whether individuals with AN and high ASD traits may require different treatment strategies or adaptations is a question for future research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据