4.6 Article

Coal-fired power plant closures and retrofits reduce asthma morbidity in the local population

期刊

NATURE ENERGY
卷 5, 期 5, 页码 365-366

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41560-020-0622-9

关键词

-

资金

  1. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
  2. Foundation for a Healthy Kentucky
  3. Owsley Brown Charitable Foundation
  4. American Lung Association
  5. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences [K99/R00 ES027023, K99/R00 ES027511, R01 ES026217]
  6. US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) [EPA 83587201]
  7. Norton Healthcare Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Retiring, transitioning or installing more stringent emissions controls in coal-fired power plants has the potential to decrease asthma attacks and asthma-related emergency department visits and hospitalizations in nearby communities. These health co-benefits should be considered in policy and decision making about coal-fired power plant retirement or retrofit. Messages for Policy Retiring or converting power plants from coal to natural gas could confer health benefits on people with asthma. In Louisville, Kentucky, coal-fired power plant retirements and SO2 control installations led to reductions in SO2 emissions and air pollution exposure. This reduction in air pollution exposure translated into substantially fewer asthma-related emergency department visits and hospitalizations. Given that 20.4 million adults, or about 9% of the population, suffer from asthma, the shift in US energy trends away from coal-fired electricity generation may reduce asthma morbidity below otherwise expected levels. Digital health tools, such as wirelessly connected inhalers that track the time and date of medication use, can assist in analysing asthma symptoms outside the hospital and in gauging the impact of air pollution exposure on a community. They may serve as supplemental public health research tools in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据