4.6 Article

The role of in situ generated morphological motifs and Cu(i) species in C2+ product selectivity during CO2 pulsed electroreduction

期刊

NATURE ENERGY
卷 5, 期 4, 页码 317-325

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41560-020-0594-9

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Research Council under grant ERC-OPERANDOCAT [ERC-725915]
  2. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) [033RCOO4D-'e-Ethylene', 03SF0523C-'CO2EKAT']
  3. Max Planck Research School for Interface Controlled Materials for Energy Conversion (IMPRS-SurMat)
  4. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germanys Excellence Strategy [EXC 2008/1 (UniSysCat), 390540038]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Carbon dioxide can be reduced electrocatalytically to fuels using copper catalysts, but the key features that determine the selectivity of these materials to specific products remains uncertain. Here Aran-Ais et al. use in situ methods to explore the influence of morphology and oxidation state on the performance of copper catalysts. The efficient electrochemical conversion of CO2 provides a route to fuels and feedstocks. Copper catalysts are well-known to be selective to multicarbon products, although the role played by the surface architecture and the presence of oxides is not fully understood. Here we report improved efficiency towards ethanol by tuning the morphology and oxidation state of the copper catalysts through pulsed CO2 electrolysis. We establish a correlation between the enhanced production of C2+ products (76% ethylene, ethanol and n-propanol at -1.0 V versus the reversible hydrogen electrode) and the presence of (100) terraces, Cu2O and defects on Cu(100). We monitored the evolution of the catalyst morphology by analysis of cyclic voltammetry curves and ex situ atomic force microscopy data, whereas the chemical state of the surface was examined via quasi in situ X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. We show that the continuous regeneration of defects and Cu(i) species synergistically favours C-C coupling pathways.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据