4.6 Article

Eliminating the Detrimental Effects of Conductive Agents in Sulfide-Based Solid-State Batteries

期刊

ACS ENERGY LETTERS
卷 5, 期 4, 页码 1243-1251

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c00256

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. Canada Research Chair Program (CRC)
  3. Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI)
  4. Ontario Research Fund (ORF)
  5. China Automotive Battery Research Institute Co., Ltd.
  6. Glabat Solid-State Battery Inc.
  7. Canada Light Source (CLS) at University of Saskatchewan
  8. Interdisciplinary Development Initiatives (IDI) by Western University
  9. University of Western Ontario
  10. 111 project of China [D17003]
  11. Mitacs Accelerate Fellowship
  12. Mitacs Elevate Postdoctoral Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sulfide-based solid-state electrolytes (SSEs) are considered a key part in the realization of high-performance all solid-state lithium-ion batteries (ASSLIBs). However, the incompatibility between conductive additives and sulfide-based SSEs in the cathode composite challenges the stable delivery of high-rate capability. Herein, a poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT) modification is designed as a semiconductive additive for cathode composites (cathode/SSE/carbon) to realize the high performance. The modified ASSLIB demonstrates a competitive rate capacity of over 100 mAh g(-1) at 1C, which is 10 times greater than that of the bare cathode. Detailed surface chemical and structural evolutions at the cathodic interface indicate the PEDOT modification not only significantly suppresses the side reactions but also realizes effective electron transfer at the cathode/SSE/carbon three-phase interface. Introducing a controllable semiconductive additive for the cathode composites in this study offers a promising design to realize the high-rate performance and overcome long-term challenges in the application of conductive additives in sulfide-based ASSLIBs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据