4.6 Article

Marine mammal skin microbiotas are influenced by host phylogeny

期刊

ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE
卷 7, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsos.192046

关键词

marine mammal; microorganism; phylogeny; SSU ribosomal RNA gene; bacteria

资金

  1. Earth Microbiome Project
  2. WHOI Marine Mammal Center
  3. WHOI Ocean Life Institute
  4. WHOI's Andrew W. Mellon Foundation Endowed Fund for Innovative Research
  5. ONR [N000141310648, N000141110612, N00014101686]
  6. NMFS [NA13OAR4540212]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Skin-associated microorganisms have been shown to play a role in immune function and disease of humans, but are understudied in marine mammals, a diverse animal group that serve as sentinels of ocean health. We examined the microbiota associated with 75 epidermal samples opportunistically collected from nine species within four marine mammal families, including: Balaenopteridae (sei and fin whales), Phocidae (harbour seal), Physeteridae (sperm whales) and Delphinidae (bottlenose dolphins, pantropical spotted dolphins, rough-toothed dolphins, short-finned pilot whales and melon-headed whales). The skin was sampled from free-ranging animals in Hawai'i (Pacific Ocean) and off the east coast of the United States (Atlantic Ocean), and the composition of the bacterial community was examined using the sequencing of partial small subunit (SSU) ribosomal RNA genes. Skin microbiotas were significantly different among host species and taxonomic families, and microbial community distance was positively correlated with mitochondrial-based host genetic divergence. The oceanic location could play a role in skin microbiota variation, but skin from species sampled in both locations is necessary to determine this influence. These data suggest that a phylosymbiotic relationship may exist between microbiota and their marine mammal hosts, potentially providing specific health and immune-related functions that contribute to the success of these animals in diverse ocean ecosystems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据