4.6 Article

Prioritizing Cancer Genes Based on an Improved Random Walk Method

期刊

FRONTIERS IN GENETICS
卷 11, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2020.00377

关键词

cancer; driver gene; protein-protein network; random walk; centrality

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U19A2064, 61873001, 61872220, 61672037]
  2. Key Project of Anhui Provincial Education De-partment [KJ2017ZD01]
  3. Key Project of Academic Funding for Top-notch Talents in Univer-sity of Anhui [gxbjZD2016007]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province [1808085QF209]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Identifying driver genes that contribute to cancer progression from numerous passenger genes, although a central goal, is a major challenge. The protein-protein interaction network provides convenient and reasonable assistance for driver gene discovery. Random walk-based methods have been widely used to prioritize nodes in social or biological networks. However, most studies select the next arriving node uniformly from the random walker's neighbors. Few consider transiting preference according to the degree of random walker's neighbors. In this study, based on the random walk method, we propose a novel approach named Driver_IRW (Driver genes discovery with Improved Random Walk method), to prioritize cancer genes in cancer-related network. The key idea of Driver_IRW is to assign different transition probabilities for different edges of a constructed cancer-related network in accordance with the degree of the nodes' neighbors. Furthermore, the global centrality (here is betweenness centrality) and Katz feedback centrality are incorporated into the framework to evaluate the probability to walk to the seed nodes. Experimental results on four cancer types indicate that Driver_IRW performs more efficiently than some previously published methods for uncovering known cancer-related genes. In conclusion, our method can aid in prioritizing cancer-related genes and complement traditional frequency and network-based methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据