4.7 Article

Self-assembled α-MnO2 urchin-like microspheres as a high-performance cathode for aqueous Zn-ion batteries

期刊

SCIENCE CHINA-MATERIALS
卷 63, 期 7, 页码 1196-1204

出版社

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s40843-020-1293-8

关键词

aqueous Zn-ion batteries; alpha-MnO2 urchin-like microspheres; fast ion diffusion coefficients; reversible phase evolution; synergistic H+-Zn2+ insertion; extraction

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFA0202400]
  2. 111 Project [B16016]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51702096, U1705256, 51572080]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2018ZD07, JB2019132]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aqueous Zn-ion batteries (AZIBs) are one of the promising battery technologies for the green energy storage and electric vehicles. As one attractive cathode material for AZIBs, alpha-MnO2 materials exhibit superior electrochemical properties. However, their long-term reversibility is still in great suspense. Considering the decisive effect of the structure and morphology on the alpha-MnO2 materials, hierarchical alpha-MnO2 materials would be promising to improve the cycle performance of AZIB. Here, we synthesized the alpha-MnO2 urchin-like microspheres (AUM) via a self-assembled method. The porous microspheres composed of one-dimensional alpha-MnO2 nanofibers with high crystallinity, which improved the surface area and active sites for Zn2+ intercalation. The AUM-based AZIB realized a high initial capacity of 308.0 mA h g(-1) and the highest energy density was 396.7 W h kg(-1) The kinetics investigation confirmed the high capacitive contribution and fast ion diffusion of the AUM. Ex-situ XRD measurement further verified the synergistic insertion/extraction of H+ and Zn2+ ions during the charge/discharge process. The superiority of the AUM guaranteed good electrochemical performance and reversible phase evolution, and this application would promote the follow-up research on the advanced AZIB.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据