4.7 Article

Machine learning for pore-water pressure time-series prediction: Application of recurrent neural networks

期刊

GEOSCIENCE FRONTIERS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 453-467

出版社

CHINA UNIV GEOSCIENCES, BEIJING
DOI: 10.1016/j.gsf.2020.04.011

关键词

Pore-water pressure; Slope; Multi-layer perceptron; Recurrent neural networks; Long short-term memory; Gated recurrent unit

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [51979158, 51639008, 51679135, 51422905]
  2. Program of Shanghai Academic Research Leader by Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [19XD1421900]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explored the applicability and advantages of recurrent neural networks (RNNs) for predicting pore-water pressure (PWP), finding that gated recurrent unit (GRU) and long short-term memory (LSTM) models can provide more precise and robust predictions compared to standard RNN. Additionally, the traditional multi-layer perceptron (MLP) showed acceptable performance but lacked robustness in PWP prediction.
Knowledge of pore-water pressure (PWP) variation is fundamental for slope stability. A precise prediction of PWP is difficult due to complex physical mechanisms and in situ natural variability. To explore the applicability and advantages of recurrent neural networks (RNNs) on PWP prediction, three variants of RNNs, i.e., standard RNN, long short-term memory (LSTM) and gated recurrent unit (GRU) are adopted and compared with a traditional static artificial neural network (ANN), i.e., multi-layer perceptron (MLP). Measurements of rainfall and PWP of representative piezometers from a fully instrumented natural slope in Hong Kong are used to establish the prediction models. The coefficient of determination (R-2) and root mean square error (RMSE) are used for model evaluations. The influence of input time series length on the model performance is investigated. The results reveal that MLP can provide acceptable performance but is not robust. The uncertainty bounds of RMSE of the MLP model range from 0.24 kPa to 1.12 kPa for the selected two piezometers. The standard RNN can perform better but the robustness is slightly affected when there are significant time lags between PWP changes and rainfall. The GRU and LSTM models can provide more precise and robust predictions than the standard RNN. The effects of the hidden layer structure and the dropout technique are investigated. The single-layer GRU is accurate enough for PWP prediction, whereas a double-layer GRU brings extra time cost with little accuracy improvement. The dropout technique is essential to overfitting prevention and improvement of accuracy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据