4.7 Article

Structure, compression and thermally insulating properties of cellulose diacetate-based aerogels

期刊

MATERIALS & DESIGN
卷 189, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108502

关键词

Cellulose diacetate; Aerogel; Structure; Compression; Thermal insulation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51702360, 51904122]
  2. Key Project of Jiangxi Provincial Research and Development [20192BBHL80016]
  3. Research Project of Science and Technology of Jiangxi Provincial Education Department [GJJ190496]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report on the relationship for structure, compression and thermal insulation properties of cellulose diacetate-based aerogels (CDBAs), prepared from cellulose diacetate (CDA) cross-linked with 2, 4-toluene diisocyanate (TDI) by using sol-gel and supercritical drying processes. Lower reactant dosage (no matter CDA or MI), can induce smaller shrinkage (similar to 12%) after supercritical drying, and even to achieve lower density (similar to 0.06 g/cm(3)) of CDBAs. Monolith CDBAs have typical three-dimensional networks with lamella reinforced fiber-like skeletons and nanometric pores. Such reinforced networking structure with lamellas as reinforcement is responsible for the maximum compression strength of similar to 1.29 MPa at 10% strain and compressive modulus of 21.86 MPa in CDBAs. Besides, the excessive addition of TDI leads to accelerate the growth of secondary fiber-like skeletons to ultimately divide the large pores into the small ones inside the formed network. This structural evolution enables to synergistically reduce gaseous thermal conductivity by means of Knudsen effect and increase that of solid part due to wider solid contacted area. The minimum total thermal conductivity of similar to 0.0313 W m(-1) K-1 at ambient environment is obtained when the synergetic effects reach up to the critical balance, whose solid and gaseous proportions are calculated as 51.76 and 48.24%, respectively. (C) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据