4.7 Article

dbPSP 2.0, an updated database of protein phosphorylation sites in prokaryotes

期刊

SCIENTIFIC DATA
卷 7, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41597-020-0506-7

关键词

-

资金

  1. Special Project on Precision Medicine under the National Key RD Program [2017YFC0906600, 2018YFC0910500]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [81701567, 31930021, 31970633, 31671360]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018M642816, 2019T120648]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2017KFXKJC001, 2019kfyRCPY043]
  5. Changjiang Scholars Program of China
  6. program for HUST Academic Frontier Youth Team

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In prokaryotes, protein phosphorylation plays a critical role in regulating a broad spectrum of biological processes and occurs mainly on various amino acids, including serine (S), threonine (T), tyrosine (Y), arginine (R), aspartic acid (D), histidine (H) and cysteine (C) residues of protein substrates. Through literature curation and public database integration, here we reported an updated database of phosphorylation sites (p-sites) in prokaryotes (dbPSP 2.0) that contains 19,296 experimentally identified p-sites in 8,586 proteins from 200 prokaryotic organisms, which belong to 12 phyla of two kingdoms, bacteria and archaea. To carefully annotate these phosphoproteins and p-sites, we integrated the knowledge from 88 publicly available resources that covers 9 aspects, namely, taxonomy annotation, genome annotation, function annotation, transcriptional regulation, sequence and structure information, family and domain annotation, interaction, orthologous information and biological pathway. In contrast to version 1.0 (similar to 30 MB), dbPSP 2.0 contains similar to 9 GB of data, with a 300-fold increased volume. We anticipate that dbPSP 2.0 can serve as a useful data resource for further investigating phosphorylation events in prokaryotes. dbPSP 2.0 is free for all users to access at: http://dbpsp.biocuckoo.cn.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据