4.7 Article

Hybrid evolutionary multi-objective optimisation using outranking-based ordinal classification methods

期刊

SWARM AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION
卷 54, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.swevo.2020.100652

关键词

Evolutionary multi-objective optimisation; Multi-criteria ordinal classification; Preference incorporation

资金

  1. CONACyT [2016-01-1920, A1-S-11012, 236154, 269890]
  2. Mexican PRODEP [UACJPTC-423]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A large number of real-world problems require optimising several objective functions at the same time, which are generally in conflict. Many of these problems have been addressed through multi-objective evolutionary algorithms. In this paper, we propose a new hybrid evolutionary algorithm whose main feature is the incorporation of the Decision Maker's (DM's) preferences through multi-criteria ordinal classification methods in early stages of the optimisation process, being progressively updated. This increases the selective pressure towards the privileged zone of the Pareto front more in agreement with the DM's preferences. An extensive experimental research was conducted to answer three main questions: i) to what extent the proposal improves the convergence towards the region of interest for the DM; ii) to what extent the proposal becomes more relevant as the number of objectives increases, and iii) to what extent the effectiveness of the hybrid algorithm depends on the particular multi-criteria method used to assign solutions to ordered classes. The issues used to evaluate our proposal and answer the questions were seven scalable test problems from the DTLZ test suite and some instances of project portfolio optimisation problems, with three and eight objectives. Compared to MOEA/D and MOEA/D-DE, the results showed that the proposed strategy obtains a better convergence towards the region of interest for the DM and also performs better characterisation of that zone on a wide range of objective functions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据