4.5 Article

Application of Hybrid Prediction Methods in Spatial Assessment of Inland Excess Water Hazard

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijgi9040268

关键词

geostatistics; hybrid spatial prediction model; inundation; land degradation; machine learning; risk mapping

资金

  1. National Research, Development and Innovation Office (NKFIH) [KH-126725, K-131820]
  2. RAINMAN project [INTERREG CE968]
  3. Higher Education Institutional Excellence Programme of the Ministry of Innovation and Technology in Hungary of the University of Debrecen [NKFIH-1150-6/2019]
  4. Hungarian Academy of Sciences [PREMIUM-2019-390]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Inland excess water is temporary water inundation that occurs in flat-lands due to both precipitation and groundwater emerging on the surface as substantial sources. Inland excess water is an interrelated natural and human induced land degradation phenomenon, which causes several problems in the flat-land regions of Hungary covering nearly half of the country. Identification of areas with high risk requires spatial modelling, that is mapping of the specific natural hazard. Various external environmental factors determine the behavior of the occurrence, frequency of inland excess water. Spatial auxiliary information representing inland excess water forming environmental factors were taken into account to support the spatial inference of the locally experienced inland excess water frequency observations. Two hybrid spatial prediction approaches were tested to construct reliable maps, namely Regression Kriging (RK) and Random Forest with Ordinary Kriging (RFK) using spatially exhaustive auxiliary data on soil, geology, topography, land use, and climate. Comparing the results of the two approaches, we did not find significant differences in their accuracy. Although both methods are appropriate for predicting inland excess water hazard, we suggest the usage of RFK, since (i) it is more suitable for revealing non-linear and more complex relations than RK, (ii) it requires less presupposition on and preprocessing of the applied data, (iii) and keeps the range of the reference data, while RK tends more heavily to smooth the estimations, while (iv) it provides a variable rank, providing explicit information on the importance of the used predictors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据