4.8 Article

CRISPR-Net: A Recurrent Convolutional Network Quantifies CRISPR Off-Target Activities with Mismatches and Indels

期刊

ADVANCED SCIENCE
卷 7, 期 13, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/advs.201903562

关键词

CRISPR systems; deep learning; off-target activities

资金

  1. Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region [CityU 11203217, CityU 11200218]
  2. Health and Medical Research Fund
  3. Food and Health Bureau, The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region [07181426]
  4. Hong Kong Institute for Data Science (HKIDS) at City University of Hong Kong
  5. City University of Hong Kong [CityU 11202219]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The off-target effects induced by guide RNAs in the CRISPR/Cas9 gene-editing system have raised substantial concerns in recent years. Many in silico predictive models have been developed for predicting the off-target activities; however, few are capable of predicting the off-target activities with insertions or deletions between guide RNA and target DNA sequence pair. In order to fill this gap, a recurrent convolutional network named CRISPR-Net is developed for scoring the gRNA-target pairs with mismatches and indels; and a machine-learning based model named CRISPR-Net-Aggregate is also developed for aggregating the scores as the consensus off-target score for each potential guide RNA. It is demonstrated that CRISPR-Net achieves competitive performance on CIRCLE-Seq and GUIDE-seq datasets with indels and mismatches, outperforming the state-of-the-art off-target prediction methods on two independent mismatch-only datasets. The CRISPR-Net-Aggregate also surpasses a competing method on the aggregation task. Moreover, a two-stage sensitivity analysis is introduced to visualize the CRISPR-Net prediction on the gRNA-target pair of interest, demonstrating how implicit knowledge encoded in CRISPR-Net contributes to the accurate off-target activity quantification. Finally, the source code is made available at the Code Ocean repository ().

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据