4.8 Article

Valorization of Lignin to Simple Phenolic Compounds over Tungsten Carbide: Impact of Lignin Structure

期刊

CHEMSUSCHEM
卷 10, 期 3, 页码 523-532

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cssc.201601326

关键词

aromatics; biomass; lignin; methanol; tungsten carbide

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21473187, 21506214, 21690083, 21690084]
  2. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB17020100]
  3. SRF for ROCS, SEM

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lignins isolated from representative hardwood, softwood, and grass materials were effectively hydrocracked to aromatics catalyzed by tungsten carbide over activated carbon (W2C/AC). The effects of botanical species and fractionation methods on lignin structure and the activity of W2C/AC were studied in detail. Gas permeation chromatography (GPC), FTIR, elemental analysis, and 2D HSQC NMR showed that all the extracted samples shared the basic skeleton of lignin, whereas the fractionation method significantly affected the structure. The organosolv process provided lignin with a structure more similar to the native lignin, which was labile to be depolymerized by W2C/AC. Softwood lignins (i.e., spruce and pine) possessed higher molecular weights than hardwood lignins (i.e., poplar and basswood); whereas corn stalk lignin that has noncanonical subunits and exhibited the lowest molecular weight owing to its shorter growth period. beta-O-4 bonds were the major linkages in all lignin samples, whereas softwood lignins contained more resistant linkages of beta-5 and less beta-beta than corn stalk and hardwood lignins; as a result, lowest hydrocracking efficiency was obtained in softwood lignins, followed by corn stalk and hardwood lignins. 2D HSQC NMR spectra of lignin and the liquid oil as well as the solid residue showed that W2C/AC exhibited high activity not only in beta-O-4 cleavage, but also in deconstruction of other ether linkages between aromatic units, so that high yield of liquid oil was obtained from lignin.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据