4.8 Article

Efficient Regular Perovskite Solar Cells Based on Pristine [70]Fullerene as Electron-Selective Contact

期刊

CHEMSUSCHEM
卷 9, 期 11, 页码 1263-1270

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cssc.201600051

关键词

electron transport; fullerenes; light harvesting; perovskite phases; thin films

资金

  1. Basque Government
  2. MINECO (Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad, Spain)
  3. Red Guipuzcoana de Ciencia
  4. Tecnologia e Innovacion [PC2015-1-03 (16-79), MAT2013-47192-C3-2-R, CTQ2015-70921]
  5. SPEED
  6. PHPT [2015-CIEN-000054-01]
  7. Polymat
  8. MINECO of Spain [IEDI-2015-00666]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

[70]Fullerene is presented as an efficient alternative electron-selective contact (ESC) for regular-architecture perovskite solar cells (PSCs). A smart and simple, well-described solution processing protocol for the preparation of [70]- and [60]fullerene-based solar cells, namely the fullerene saturation approach (FSA), allowed us to obtain similar power conversion efficiencies for both fullerene materials (i.e., 10.4 and 11.4% for [70]- and [60]fullerene-based devices, respectively). Importantly, despite the low electron mobility and significant visible-light absorption of [70]fullerene, the presented protocol allows the employment of [70]fullerene as an efficient ESC. The [70]fullerene film thickness and its solubility in the perovskite processing solutions are crucial parameters, which can be controlled by the use of this simple solution processing protocol. The damage to the [70]fullerene film through dissolution during the perovskite deposition is avoided through the saturation of the perovskite processing solution with [70]fullerene. Additionally, this fullerene-saturation strategy improves the performance of the perovskite film significantly and enhances the power conversion efficiency of solar cells based on different ESCs (i.e., [60]fullerene, [70]fullerene, and TiO2). Therefore, this universal solution processing protocol widens the opportunities for the further development of PSCs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据