4.1 Article

Pilot study on nanofiltration membrane in advanced treatment of drinking water

期刊

WATER SUPPLY
卷 20, 期 6, 页码 2043-2053

出版社

IWA PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.2166/ws.2020.089

关键词

high quality drinking water; nanofiltration; PARAFAC; trihalomethanes (THMs)

资金

  1. International Science and Technology Cooperation Program of China [2016YFE0123700]
  2. Major Science and Technology Program for Water Pollution Control and Treatment [2017ZX07201001]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of China [51708130]
  4. College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
  5. School of the Environment and Municipal Administration, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou, China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, nanofiltration (NF) was used to further treat the water from the disinfection process of a drinking water treatment plant (DWTP). The results indicate that the NF process reduced the dissolved organic carbon (DOC) by 92.87%, UV absorbance at 254 nm (UVA(254)) by 88.68%, conductivity by 94% and total dissolved solids by 94.49%. The removal efficiencies of trihalomethanes (THMs), 2-methylisoborneol (2-MIB) and trans-1,10-dimethyl-trans-9-decalol (geosmin) were also evaluated for both the DWTP and NF treatment processes. High-performance size-exclusion chromatography (HPSEC) analysis, three-dimensional excitation-emission matrix (3D-EEM) fluorescence spectroscopy and parallel factor (PARAFAC) analysis were applied to characterize the changes in different organic compounds in each process. A correlation analysis was carried out for samples of the raw water, feed water and permeate water to determine the correlations between the maximum fluorescence intensities (F-max) of the PARAFAC components and the DOC, UVA(254) and high specific UV absorbance (SUVA) of the samples. The results showed that a significant correlation (p < 0.01) existed between UVA(254) and the F-max of the three PARAFAC components as well as between DOC and F-max.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据