4.5 Article

Two-Dimensional Metals for Piezoelectriclike Devices Based on Berry-Curvature Dipole

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW APPLIED
卷 13, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.13.044014

关键词

-

资金

  1. NBRP of China [2019YFA0308403]
  2. National Nature Science Foundation of China [11822407, 11947212]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018M640513]
  4. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Piezotronics is an emerging field, which exploits strain to control the transport properties in condensed matters. At present, piezotronics research majorly focuses on insulators with tunable electric dipole by strain. Metals are excluded in this type of application due to the absence of the electric dipole. The recently discovered Berry-curvature dipole can exist in metals, consequently introduces the possibility of the piezoelectric phenomena in them. In this paper, we predict that strain can switch the Berry-curvature dipole, and lead to the nonlinear Hall effect in the two-dimensional (2D) 1H-MX2 (M = Nb, Ta; X = S, Se). Based on symmetry analysis and first-principles calculations, we show these 2D monolayer metals have the desired piezoelectriclike property: without strain, the Berry-curvature dipole is eliminated by symmetry, prohibiting the nonlinear Hall effect; while uniaxial strain can effectively reduce the symmetry to introduce sizable Berry-curvature dipole, and it can generate observable Hall voltage under a reasonable experimental condition. Due to the nonlinear and topological properties, the piezoelectriclike property here is quite different from the traditional one based on the electric dipole. Compared with the traditional piezoelectric materials, which can only exist in insulators, we manifest that the 2D metallic 1H-MX2 (M = Nb, Ta; X = S, Se) can be applied in the platform for piezoelectriclike devices such as strain sensors, terahertz detections, energy harvesters etc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据