4.5 Article

Spin-Orbit Torque in a Perpendicularly Magnetized Ferrimagnetic Tb-Co Single Layer

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW APPLIED
卷 13, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.13.044030

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [NRF-2015M3D1A1070465, 2017R1A2A2A05069760, 2018R1A4A1020 696]
  2. NanoMaterial Technology Development Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT, and Future Planning [2009-0082580]
  3. NRF - Korea government (MSIP
  4. Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning) [NRF-2018H1A2A1060105]
  5. National Research Foundation of Korea [2017R1A2A2A05069760] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Spin-orbit torque (SOT) has been studied extensively in a heavy-metal (HM)/ferromagnet (FM) bilayer structure, where a HM is an essential ingredient because a spin current is generated via the spin Hall effect within the HM layer and/or the Rashba-Edelstein effect from the HM/FM interface. Here, we report the observation of SOT in a ferrimagnetic Tb-Co single layer with perpendicular magnetic anisotropy without a HM layer. Using harmonic Hall voltage measurements, we investigate the SOT-induced dampinglike effective field (B-DL) in a Tb-Co layer; the sign of B-DL is opposite from that of a Pt/Tb-Co bilayer, and the magnitude of B-DL increases as the Tb-Co composition approaches its magnetization compensation point. Moreover, we analyze the elemental composition of Tb-Co as a function of film thickness using scanning transmission electron microscopy and electron energy-loss spectroscopy, indicating that the sign and magnitude of the SOT are virtually insensitive to the vertical composition gradient within the Tb-Co layer. Our results demonstrate that the bulk spin-orbit interaction within the Tb-Co layer itself plays a major role in generating SOT in a Tb-Co single layer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据