4.2 Article

Factors associated with seasonal influenza self-diagnosis: a prospective observational study in Japan

期刊

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41533-020-0165-3

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This prospective observational study, conducted at a community clinic in Japan during the influenza season, from December 2017 to April 2018 aimed to investigate the accuracy of factors used for influenza self-diagnosis. Data were collected from pre-examination checklists issued to patients with suspected influenza and electronic medical records. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed using a rapid influenza diagnostic test as the reference standard, and 2 x 2 contingency tables were analysed at each cut-off point. We analysed data from 290 patients (72.8% males, median age: 38 years, interquartile range: 26-50 years). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for patients who were aware of other patients presumed to have influenza within close proximity was 0.74 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.66-0.82). The AUCs for patients with a history of influenza, unvaccinated status, cough, or nasal discharge were 0.68 (95% CI: 0.60-0.75), 0.66 (95% CI: 0.59-0.73), 0.67 (95% CI: 0.59-0.75), and 0.70 (95% CI: 0.62-0.78), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity and positive likelihood ratio at a 90% cut-off point was 19.5% (95% CI: 13.5-26.6%), 94.1% (95% CI: 88.7-97.4%) and 3.31 (95% CI: 1.57-6.98). The sensitivity, specificity and negative likelihood ratio at a 10% cut-off point was 95.5% (95% CI: 90.9-98.2%), 9.6% (95% CI: 5.2-15.8%) and 0.48 (95% CI: 0.20-1.16). After multivariate logistic regression analysis, the AUC increased significantly from 0.77 (95% CI: 0.70-0.83) to 0.81 (95% CI: 0.76-0.86) when self-diagnosis-related information was added to basic clinical information. We identified factors that improve the accuracy and validity of influenza self-diagnosis. Appropriate self-diagnosis could contribute to the containment efforts during influenza epidemics and reduce its social and economic burden.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据