4.7 Article

Calligraphed Selective Plasmonic Arrays on Paper Platforms for Complementary Dual Optical ON/OFF Switch Sensing

期刊

NANOMATERIALS
卷 10, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nano10061025

关键词

nanoparticles; plasmonic lines; multiplexed paper substrate; ON; OFF switch detection; SERS; MEF

资金

  1. Romanian Ministry of Research and Innovation, CCCDI-UEFISCDI [PN-III-P1-1.1-TE-2016-2095]
  2. STAR-UBB (Babes-Bolyai University) [35.997/28.11.2018]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Designing innovative (nano)detection platforms, respecting their low-cost and fabrication simplicity, capable to chemically detect multiple target analytes by employing the same engineered device, is still a great challenge in the multiplexed biosensor development. In this scientific context, in the current manuscript, we exploit the low-cost plasmonic calligraphy as a versatile approach to directly draw continuous plasmonic lines on Whatman paper using a regular ballpoint pen successively filled with two different anisotropic nanoparticles shapes (gold bipyramids-AuBPs and gold nanorods-AuNRs) as colloidal inks. After the efficient immobilization of the positively-charged AuBPs and AuNRs onto the paper fibres, proved by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) investigations, the specificity of our as-calligraphed-paper platform is ensured by coating the selected lines with a thin layer of anionic poly(styrene sulfonate) polyelectrolyte, creating, consequently, a well-defined plasmonic array of charge-selective regions. Finally, the functionality of the well-isolated and as-miniaturized active plasmonic array is, subsequently, tested using the anionic Rose-Bengal and cationic Rhodamine 6G target analytes and proved by complementary dual optical ON/OFF Switch sensing (i.e. Surface-enhanced Raman Scattering sensing/metal-enhanced fluorescence sensing) onto the same plasmonic line, developing thus a simple multiplexed plasmonic array platform, which could further facilitate the well-desired biomarker detection in complex mixtures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据