4.7 Article

Tunable Photodetectors via In Situ Thermal Conversion of TiS3 to TiO2

期刊

NANOMATERIALS
卷 10, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nano10040711

关键词

2D materials; photodetectors; oxidation; TiS3; TiO2; Raman spectroscopy; DFT GW

资金

  1. European Commission under the Graphene Flagship [CNECTICT-604391]
  2. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) [680-50-1515]
  3. European Union [793318]
  4. Spanish Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad [FIS2016-79464-P]
  5. Grupo Consolidado UPV/EHU del Gobierno Vasco [IT578-13]
  6. MINECO-FEDER [MAT2015-65203-R]
  7. MEXT, Japan
  8. CREST [JPMJCR15F3]
  9. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [793318] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In two-dimensional materials research, oxidation is usually considered as a common source for the degradation of electronic and optoelectronic devices or even device failure. However, in some cases a controlled oxidation can open the possibility to widely tune the band structure of 2D materials. In particular, we demonstrate the controlled oxidation of titanium trisulfide (TiS3), a layered semicon-ductor that has attracted much attention recently thanks to its quasi-1D electronic and optoelectron-ic properties and its direct bandgap of 1.1 eV. Heating TiS3 in air above 300 degrees C gradually converts it into TiO2, a semiconductor with a wide bandgap of 3.2 eV with applications in photo-electrochemistry and catalysis. In this work, we investigate the controlled thermal oxidation of indi-vidual TiS3 nanoribbons and its influence on the optoelectronic properties of TiS3-based photodetec-tors. We observe a step-wise change in the cut-off wavelength from its pristine value similar to 1000 nm to 450 nm after subjecting the TiS3 devices to subsequent thermal treatment cycles. Ab-initio and many-body calculations confirm an increase in the bandgap of titanium oxysulfide (TiO2-xSx) when in-creasing the amount of oxygen and reducing the amount of sulfur.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据