4.7 Review

Nanomedicines for the Delivery of Antimicrobial Peptides (AMPs)

期刊

NANOMATERIALS
卷 10, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nano10030560

关键词

antimicrobial peptides; bacterial and virus infections; coronavirus; antimicrobial resistance; nanomaterials; nanomedicine

资金

  1. Institute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology
  2. Portuguese Science and Technology Foundation (FCT/MCT)
  3. European Funds (PRODER/COMPETE) [M-ERA-NET-0004/2015-PAIRED, UIDB/04469/2020]
  4. FEDER
  5. FCT [PD/BDE/135086/2017]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microbial infections are still among the major public health concerns since several yeasts and fungi, and other pathogenic microorganisms, are responsible for continuous growth of infections and drug resistance against bacteria. Antimicrobial resistance rate is fostering the need to develop new strategies against drug-resistant superbugs. Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are small peptide-based molecules of 5-100 amino acids in length, with potent and broad-spectrum antimicrobial properties. They are part of the innate immune system, which can represent a minimal risk of resistance development. These characteristics contribute to the description of these molecules as promising new molecules in the development of new antimicrobial drugs. However, efforts in developing new medicines have not resulted in any decrease of drug resistance yet. Thus, a technological approach on improving existing drugs is gaining special interest. Nanomedicine provides easy access to innovative carriers, which ultimately enable the design and development of targeted delivery systems of the most efficient drugs with increased efficacy and reduced toxicity. Based on performance, successful experiments, and considerable market prospects, nanotechnology will undoubtedly lead a breakthrough in biomedical field also for infectious diseases, as there are several nanotechnological approaches that exhibit important roles in restoring antibiotic activity against resistant bacteria.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据