4.0 Article

RehaCom rehabilitation training improves a wide-range of cognitive functions in multiple sclerosis patients

期刊

APPLIED NEUROPSYCHOLOGY-ADULT
卷 29, 期 2, 页码 262-272

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/23279095.2020.1747070

关键词

Attention; executive functions; multiple sclerosis (MS); working memory; RehaCom

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the effect of RehaCom on cognitive functions in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). The results showed that RehaCom treatment improved attention, response control, processing speed, working memory, visuospatial skills, and executive functions in MS patients.
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic neurodegenerative disease that impairs cognitive performance. Attention, response control, working memory, and processing speed are highly impaired in MS. On the other hand, RehaCom is a computerized software that improves cognitive dysfunctions. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of RehaCom on attention, response control, processing speed, working memory, visuospatial skills, and verbal/non-verbal executive functions in MS patients. Sixty patients were selected randomly and divided into control (n = 30) and experimental (n = 30) groups. Integrated Auditory Visual-2 (IVA-2), Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT), Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT), Judgment of Line Orientation (JLO) and The Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (DKEFS) were used to assess cognitive functions. Patients in the experimental group were treated by RehaCom for 5 weeks (two 60-min sessions per week). Cognitive performance of all patients in both groups was assessed at weeks 5 and 10 (post-test and follow-up stages, respectively). The results showed that RehaCom treatment improved all studied cognitive functions at the post-test stage. This effect also remained at the follow-up stage for some cognitive functions. In conclusion, treatment with RehaCom may have significant therapeutic effects on cognitive dysfunctions in MS patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据