4.6 Article

Inverse Designed Metalenses with Extended Depth of Focus

期刊

ACS PHOTONICS
卷 7, 期 4, 页码 873-878

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsphotonics.9b01703

关键词

diffractive optics; dielectric metasurface; extended depth of focus lens; inverse design; cylindrical lens

资金

  1. Samsung-GRO
  2. UW reality lab
  3. Google
  4. Huawei
  5. Facebook
  6. U.S. Army Research Office through the Institute for Soldier Nanotechnologies [W911NF-13-D-0001]
  7. National Science Foundation [NNCI-1542101, 1337840, 0335765]
  8. National Institutes of Health
  9. Molecular Engineering and Sciences Institute
  10. Clean Energy Institute
  11. Washington Research Foundation
  12. M. J. Murdock Charitable Trust
  13. Altatech
  14. ClassOne Technology
  15. GCE Market
  16. SPTS
  17. [NSF-1825308]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Extended depth of focus (EDOF) lenses are important for various applications in computational imaging and microscopy. In addition to enabling novel functionalities, EDOF lenses can alleviate the need for stringent alignment requirements for imaging systems. Existing designs, however, are often inefficient or produce an asymmetric point spread function (PSF) that blurs images. Inverse design of nanophotonics, including metasurfaces, has generated strong interest in recent years owing to its potential for generating exotic and innovative optical elements, which are generally difficult to design based on intuition alone. Using adjoint optimization-based inverse electromagnetic design, in this paper, we designed a cylindrical metasurface lens operating at similar to 625 nm with a depth of focus exceeding that of an ordinary lens. We validated our design by nanofabrication and optical characterization of silicon nitride metasurface lenses (with a lateral dimension of 66.66 mu m) with three different focal lengths (66.66, 100, and 133.33 mu m). The focusing efficiencies of the fabricated extended depth of focus metasurface lenses are similar to those of traditional metalenses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据