4.6 Article

Life Cycle Costing: Understanding How It Is Practised and Its Relationship to Life Cycle Management-A Case Study

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 12, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su12083252

关键词

product-service systems; servitization; performativity; life cycle engineering; cost accounting; sustainability; research and development; R&D; total cost of ownership; barriers

资金

  1. Mistra REES (Resource-Efficient and Effective Solutions) program - Mistra (The Swedish Foundation for Strategic Environmental Research) [2014/16]
  2. case company

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite the existence of many life cycle costing (LCC) methods, LCC is not widely adopted and LCC methods are usually further tailored by practitioners. Moreover, little is known about how practising LCC improves life cycle management (LCM) especially if LCM is considered emergent and constantly developing. In a manufacturing company, LCC is prescriptively introduced to improve LCM. In the first part, this study describes how various methodological choices and other aspects of practising LCC were the outcome of contestation and conformity with extant practices and not only the best way to fulfil the LCC's objective. This contestation can even influence if LCC is adopted. In the second part of the research, the implications of practising LCC on LCM are explored. LCC is found to positively propel LCM in many ways e.g., by spreading the life cycle idea, but may lead to a narrower understanding of the term life cycle resulting in the sustainability focus of LCM being overridden. The article also discusses how the findings can be taken into consideration when researchers develop LCC methods and when industry practises LCC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据