3.8 Article

2D/2D Heterojunction of R-scheme Ti3C2 MXene/MoS2 Nanosheets for Enhanced Photocatalytic Performance

期刊

NANOSCALE RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 15, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1186/s11671-020-03314-z

关键词

2D; 2D heterojunction; Hydrothermal reaction; Photocatalytic degradation; H-2 evolution reaction

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1806221, 51672198]
  2. Innovation and Development Project of Zibo City [2017CX01A022]
  3. Instruction & Development Project for National Funding Innovation Demonstration Zone of Shandong Province [2016-181-11, 2017-41-1, 2017-41-3, 2018ZCQZB01, 2019ZCQZB03]
  4. Central Guiding Local Science and Technology Development Special Funds [2060503]
  5. Key Research & Design Program of Shandong Province [2019GGX102011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Combination of two-dimensional (2D) materials and semiconductors is considered to be an effective way for fabricating photocatalysts for solving the environmental pollution and energy crisis. In this work, novel 2D/2D heterojunction of R-scheme Ti3C2 MXene/MoS2 nanosheets is successfully synthesized by hydrothermal reaction. The photocatalytic activity of the Ti3C2 MXene/MoS2 composites is evaluated by photocatalytic degradation and hydrogen evolution reaction. Especially, 0.5 wt% Ti3C2 MXene/MoS2 sample exhibits optimum methyl orange (MO) degradation and H-2 evolution rate of 97.4% and H-2 evolution rate of 380.2 mu mol h(-1) g(-1), respectively, which is attributed to the enhanced optical absorption ability and increased specific surface area. Additionally, Ti3C2 MXene coupled with MoS2 nanosheets is favorable for improving the photocurrent response and reducing the electrochemical impedance, leading to the enhanced electron transfer of excited semiconductor and inhibition of charge recombination. This work demonstrates that Ti3C2 MXene could be a promising carrier to construct 2D/2D heterojunction in photocatalytic degradation and hydrogen evolution reaction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据