4.8 Article

Harnessing the interplay of Fe-Ni atom pairs embedded in nitrogen-doped carbon for bifunctional oxygen electrocatalysis

期刊

NANO ENERGY
卷 71, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.104597

关键词

Dual-metal atomic pairs; Fe-Ni bonds; Nitrogen doped carbon; Oxygen evolution reaction; Oxygen reduction reaction; Rechargeable zinc-air battery

资金

  1. Australian Research Council (ARC) [FL-140100081, DE170100375]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology in Taiwan [MOST 106-2112-M-003-007-MY3, MOST 107-2113-M002-008-MY3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Oxygen evolution reaction (OER) and oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) both have sluggish kinetics, which normally requires the use of noble metal-based catalysts (e.g. RuO2, IrOx and Pt). Unfortunately, the high cost of these noble metals has severely restricted their large-scale applications. Herein, we report the fabrication of a cost-effective OER/ORR bifunctional catalyst by embedding atomic Fe-Ni dual metal pairs into nitrogen-doped carbon hollow spheres (Fe-NiNC-50). The resultant catalyst shows exceptional catalytic performance towards both OER and ORR, which is even comparable to the noble metal-based benchmarks. By virtue of its bi-functionality, a rechargeable zinc-air battery is constructed and presents high power density (similar to 220 mW cm(-2)), stable discharge voltage and large specific energy density (similar to 932.66 Wh kg(Zn)(-1)). Moreover, the rechargeable Zn-air battery exhibits long-term durability in a charge-discharge cycling test (100 h) with negligible performance degradation. The outstanding bifunctional catalytic performance can be ascribed to the formation of Fe-Ni atomic pairs, which imposes mutual effects for tuning electronic structures of both Fe and Ni sites. Experiments and theoretical calculations further unravel that the electronically modified Ni and Fe atoms are the active sites for OER and ORR, respectively, facilitating both OER and ORR by tuning the binding energy of the reaction intermediates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据