4.6 Article

Colonization and Internalization ofSalmonella entericaand Its Prevalence in Cucumber Plants

期刊

FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY
卷 11, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01135

关键词

Salmonella; cucumber; fitness; internalization; blossom

资金

  1. Lifesource Biomedical LLC
  2. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Consumption of cucumbers (Cucumis sativusvar.sativus) has been linked to several foodborne outbreaks involvingSalmonella enterica. The purpose of this work was to investigate the efficiency of colonization and internalization ofS. entericainto cucumber plants by various routes of contamination. Produce-associated outbreak strains ofSalmonella(a cocktail of serovars Javiana, Montevideo, Newport, Poona, and Typhimurium) were introduced to three cultivars of cucumber plants (two slicing cultivars and one pickling) via blossoms (ca. 6.4 log(10)CFU/blossom, 4.5 log(10)CFU/blossom, or 2.5 log(10)CFU/blossom) or soil (ca. 8.3 log(10)CFU/root zone) and were analyzed for prevalence ofSalmonellacontamination (internal and external) and serovar predominance in fruit and stems. Of the total slicing fruit harvested fromSalmonella-inoculated blossoms (ca. 6.4, 4.5, or 2.5 log(10)CFU/blossom), 83.9% (47/56), 81.4% (48/59) or 71.2% (84/118) were found colonized and 67.9% (38/56), 35.6% (21/59) or 22.0% (26/118) hadSalmonellainternalized into the fruit, respectively.S.Poona was the most prevalent serovar isolated on or in cucumber fruits at all inoculation levels. When soil was inoculated at 1 day post-transplant (dpt), 8% (10/120) of the plants were shown to translocateSalmonellato the lower stem 7 days post-inoculation (dpi). Results identified blossoms as an important route by whichSalmonellainternalized at a high percentage into cucumbers, andS.Poona, the same strain isolated from the 2015 outbreak of cucumbers imported from Mexico, was shown to be well-adapted to the blossom niche.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据