4.6 Article

Metagenomic Analyses of Microbial and Carbohydrate-Active Enzymes in the Rumen of Dairy Goats Fed Different Rumen Degradable Starch

期刊

FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY
卷 11, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01003

关键词

metagenomics; microbiome; CAZymes; rumen degradable starch; dairy goats

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Projects [2017YFD0500500]
  2. Science and Technological Project of Shaanxi Province, China [2017TSCXL-NY-04-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of different dietary rumen degradable starch (RDS) on the diversity of carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZymes) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes Orthology functional categories to explore carbohydrate degradation in dairy goats. Eighteen dairy goats (second lactation, 45.8 +/- 1.54 kg) were divided in three groups fed low RDS (LRDS), medium RDS (MRDS), and high RDS (HRDS) diets. The results showed that, HRDS treatment group significantly decreased the ruminal pH (P < 0.05), and increased the propionate proportion (P < 0.05), fumarate and succinate concentrations (P < 0.05), trended to increase lactate concentration (P = 0.50) compared with LRDS group. The relative abundance of acetogens, such as family Clostridiaceae and Ruminococcaceae, genera Clostridium and Blautia were higher in HRDS than LRDS feeding goats. The GH9 family (responsible for cellulose degradation) genes were lower in HRDS than MRDS diet samples, and mainly produced by Prevotellaceae, Ruminococcaceae, and Bacteroidaceae. Amylose (EC3.2.1.3) genes under HRDS treatment were more abundant than under LRDS treatment. However, the abundance of GH13_9 and CBM48 (responsible for starch degradation) were reduced in HRDS group indicating the decreased binding activity from catalytic modules to starch. This study revealed that HRDS-fed dairy goats had decreased CAZymes, which encode enzymes degrade cellulose and starch in the dairy goats.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据