4.8 Article

A calibrated optogenetic toolbox of stable zebrafish opsin lines

期刊

ELIFE
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELIFE SCIENCES PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.54937

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Horizon 2020 Framework Programme Marie Curie Incoming International Fellowship, H2020-MSCA-IF-2016 Project [752199]
  2. Human Frontier Science Program [RGP063-2018, LT393/2010]
  3. New York Stem Cell Foundation [NYSCF-R-NI39]
  4. Wellcome [204708/Z/16/Z, 101195/Z/13/Z]
  5. Royal Society [101195/Z/13/Z]
  6. University College London
  7. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SPP1926]
  8. Max Planck Society
  9. Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-10-IAIHU-06, ANR-11-INBS-0011]
  10. Wellcome Trust [101195/Z/13/Z, 204708/Z/16/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust
  11. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [752199] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Optogenetic actuators with diverse spectral tuning, ion selectivity and kinetics are constantly being engineered providing powerful tools for controlling neural activity with subcellular resolution and millisecond precision. Achieving reliable and interpretable in vivo optogenetic manipulations requires reproducible actuator expression and calibration of photocurrents in target neurons. Here, we developed nine transgenic zebrafish lines for stable opsin expression and calibrated their efficacy in vivo. We first used high-throughput behavioural assays to compare opsin ability to elicit or silence neural activity. Next, we performed in vivo whole-cell electrophysiological recordings to quantify the amplitude and kinetics of photocurrents and test opsin ability to precisely control spiking. We observed substantial variation in efficacy, associated with differences in both opsin expression level and photocurrent characteristics, and identified conditions for optimal use of the most efficient opsins. Overall, our calibrated optogenetic toolkit will facilitate the design of controlled optogenetic circuit manipulations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据