4.7 Article

Role of naive-derived T memory stem cells in T-cell reconstitution following allogeneic transplantation

期刊

BLOOD
卷 125, 期 18, 页码 2855-2864

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2014-11-608406

关键词

-

资金

  1. Fondazione Cariplo [Ricerca Biomedica 2012/0683]
  2. European Union [322093]
  3. Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro [MFAG 10607, IG 14687]
  4. Italian Ministry of Health [GR-2008-1135082, GR-2011-02347324]
  5. National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
  6. Humanitas Intramural Research and Clinical Funding Programs
  7. Fondazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro
  8. Wellcome Trust [100326/Z/12/Z] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Early T-cell reconstitution following allogeneic transplantation depends on the persistence and function of T cells that are adoptively transferred with the graft. Posttransplant cyclophosphamide (pt-Cy) effectively prevents alloreactive responses from unmanipulated grafts, but its effect on subsequent immune reconstitution remains undetermined. Here, we show that T memory stem cells (TSCM), which demonstrated superior reconstitution capacity in preclinical models, are the most abundant circulating T-cell population in the early days following haploidentical transplantation combined with pt-Cy and precede the expansion of effector cells. Transferred naive, but not TSCM or conventional memory cells preferentially survive cyclophosphamide, thus suggesting that posttransplant TSCM originate from naive precursors. Moreover, donor naive T cells specific for exogenous and self/tumor antigens persist in the host and contribute to peripheral reconstitution by differentiating into effectors. Similarly, pathogen-specific memory T cells generate detectable recall responses, but only in the presence of the cognate antigen. We thus define the cellular basis of T-cell reconstitution following pt-Cy at the antigen-specific level and propose to explore naive-derived TSCM in the clinical setting to overcome immunodeficiency.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据