4.6 Article

Extraction Behavior and Separation of Precious and Base Metals from Chloride, Bromide, and Iodide Media Using Undiluted Halide Ionic Liquids

期刊

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
卷 8, 期 22, 页码 8223-8234

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c01181

关键词

Aliquat 336 halides; Base metals; Ionic liquids; Precious metals; Solvent extraction

资金

  1. KU Leuven [C24/18/042]
  2. (ISOMER)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Within the framework of metal separations and solvent extraction, chloride media are among the most studied systems. Bromide and iodide media have received much less attention, but can allow a different selectivity during the extraction. In present research, the extraction behavior of several precious and base metal ions, i.e. Pt(IV), pd(II), Rh(III), Au(III), Cu(II), Fe(III), and Ni(II), from the different halide media was explored using the undiluted ionic liquid Aliquat 336 chloride and its bromide and iodide analogues. A single-step separation of Pt(IV) and Pd(II) from Fe(III) and Ni(II) was possible in the iodide system, but it was found to be incompatible with Au(III) and Cu(II). The chloride and bromide media showed potential for the separation of Au(III), Pd(II), Fe(III), and Cu(II), and their performance was subsequently compared. Fe(III) and Cu(II) were easily separated from Au(III) and Pd(II) via an extraction at low acid concentration followed by scrubbing with water for both systems. However, the stripping showed superior characteristics for the bromide system, where Pd(II) could be recovered using a 0.2 mol L-1 ammonia solution and Au(III) using 1.0 mol L-1 sodium sulfite. The proposed method for the separation of Au(III), Pd(II), Fe(III), and Cu(II) can be relevant for the recycling of waste electric and electronic equipment or analytical applications. The results highlight the importance of considering halides other than chloride, as both the extraction and stripping properties of the system can be changed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据