4.6 Article

Biomass Activated Carbon/SiO2-Based Imprinted Membranes for Selective Separation of Atrazine: A Synergistic Integration System

期刊

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
卷 8, 期 14, 页码 5636-5647

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c00232

关键词

Molecularly imprinted membranes; Cellulose acetate; Atrazine; Selective separation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21808089, 21878120, B070202, 51803080, 21777062]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20180886, BK20180192, BK20181229, BK20171315, BK20161367]
  3. Chinese Postdoctoral Science Foundation [1501067C, 1701103B]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The extensive use of atrazine in agricultural production has caused increasingly serious environmental risk. It is significant to establish an efficient and environmentally friendly method for removing or treating atrazine pollution from the environment. Herein, the original atrazine-based molecularly imprinted nanocomposite membranes (AMINMs) were first proposed by developing a biomass-based hybrid membrane strategy based on two kinds of inorganic nanoparticles. Inspired from the as-designed nanocomposite-integrated system, integrating biomass activated carbon nanoparticles (BAC) and SiO2 nanoparticles as the porous fillers into basal membranes to improve the various properties of the molecularly imprinted nanocomposite membranes, and the specific effects of SiO2/BAC nanoparticles were systematically examined. Adsorption (adsorption isotherm and adsorption kinetics) and permselectivity experiments were used to test and valuate the selective separation performance of the AMINMs. The valuable experimental results proved that the asprepared AMINMs not only exhibit ideal specific adsorption ability (5.857 mg/g), but also possess excellent permselectivity performance for atrazine (permselectivity factor beta is 2.34). Due to its high specific recognition ability and permselectivity, AMINMs showed great potential in atrazine pollution treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据