4.7 Article

The potential neurotoxicity of emerging tetrabromobisphenol A derivatives based on rat pheochromocytoma cells

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 154, 期 -, 页码 194-203

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.03.117

关键词

TBBPA derivatives; PC12; Neurotoxicity

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2015CB453102]
  2. Major International (Regional) Joint Project [21461142001]
  3. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Science [14040302]
  4. National Natural Science Funds of China [21477153, 21137002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBPA) can cause diverse adverse effects including neurotoxicity. Emerging TBBPA derivatives, with high structure similarity to the parent compound, are now being concerned. In this study, the potential neurotoxicities of four TBBPA derivatives and their parent compound were studied by cell viability inhibition in rat pheochromocytoma cells (PC12) and the corresponding molecular mechanisms were investigated. The cellular toxicity was correlated with the chemical hydrophobicity. Tetrabromobisphenol A bis(2-hydroxyethyl ether) (TBBPA-BHEE) exhibited the highest cellular toxicity to PC12 due to its lowest hydrophobicity among these 5 tested compounds. Further experiments showed that TBBPA-BHEE disturbed dopamine (DA) secretion and altered acetylcholinesterase (AChE) enzymatic activity in PC12 cells. The molecular mechanism study indicated that TBBPA-BHEE induced cellular toxicity to PC12 cells through ROS-mediated caspase activation to a large extent, which was partially attenuated by the anti-oxidation of Vitamin E. Moreover, in contrast to TBBPA, the occurrence of TBBPA-BHEE toxicity to PC12 was not attributed to activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) or thyroid hormone (TH) signaling pathway. These findings suggest TBBPA derivatives, especially TBBPA-BHEE, as potential neurotoxins need urgent attention. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据