4.7 Article

Effects of Microcystin-LR on Metabolic Functions and Structure Succession of Sediment Bacterial Community under Anaerobic Conditions

期刊

TOXINS
卷 12, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/toxins12030183

关键词

microcystin; bacterial community; metabolic profile; high throughput analysis; anaerobic condition

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [81972997]
  2. Graduate Research and Innovation Projects of Jiangsu Province [SJKY19_0140]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microcystins (MCs), which are produced by harmful cyanobacteria blooms, pose a serious threat to environmental health. However, the effect of MCs on the bacterial community under anaerobic conditions is still unclear. This study examined the dynamic changes of MC-degrading capacity, metabolic activity, and structure of the bacterial community in lake sediment repeatedly treated with 1 mg/L microcystin-LR (MC-LR) under anaerobic conditions. The results showed that the MC-degrading capacity of the bacterial community was increased nearly three-fold with increased treatment frequency. However, the metabolic profile behaved in exactly opposite trend, in which the overall carbon metabolic activity was inhibited by repeated toxin addition. Microbial diversity was suppressed by the first addition of MC-LR and then gradually recovered. The 16S amplicon sequencing showed that the dominant genera were changed from Exiguobacterium and Acinetobacter to Prosthecobacter, Dechloromonas, and Agrobacterium. Furthermore, the increase in the relative abundance of Dechloromonas, Pseudomonas, Hydrogenophaga, and Agrobacterium was positively correlated with the MC-LR treatment times. This indicates that they might be responsible for MC degradation under anaerobic conditions. Our findings reveal the relationship between MC-LR and the sediment bacterial community under anaerobic conditions and indicate that anaerobic biodegradation is an effective and promising method to remediate MCs pollution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据