4.7 Article

Relation of Photochemical Reflectance Indices Based on Different Wavelengths to the Parameters of Light Reactions in Photosystems I and II in Pea Plants

期刊

REMOTE SENSING
卷 12, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs12081312

关键词

photochemical reflectance index (PRI); modified PRIs; light-induced changes in PRIs; parameters of light reaction in photosystem I; parameters of light reaction in photosystem II; slow-relaxing changes in PRI; fast-relaxing changes in PRI; light curve

资金

  1. Russian Science Foundation [17-76-20032]
  2. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [20-016-00234 A.]
  3. Russian Science Foundation [17-76-20032] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Measurement and analysis of the numerous reflectance indices of plants is an effective approach for the remote sensing of plant physiological processes in agriculture and ecological monitoring. A photochemical reflectance index (PRI) plays an important role in this kind of remote sensing because it can be related to early changes in photosynthetic processes under the action of stressors (excess light, changes in temperature, drought, etc.). In particular, we previously showed that light-induced changes in PRIs could be strongly related to the energy-dependent component of the non-photochemical quenching in photosystem II. The aim of the present work was to undertake comparative analysis of the efficiency of using light-induced changes in PRIs (Delta PRIs) based on different wavelengths for the estimation of the parameters of photosynthetic light reactions (including the parameters of photosystem I). Pea plants were used in the investigation; the photosynthetic parameters were measured using the pulse-amplitude-modulated (PAM) fluorometer Dual-PAM-100 and the intensities of the reflected light were measured using the spectrometer S100. The Delta PRIs were calculated as Delta PRI(band,570), where the band was 531 nm for the typical PRI and 515, 525, 535, 545, or 555 nm for modified PRIs; 570 nm was the reference wavelength for all PRIs. There were several important results: (1) PRI(525,570), PRI(531,570), PRI(535,570), and PRI(545,570) could be used for estimation of most of the photosynthetic parameters under light only or under dark only conditions. (2) The combination of dark and light conditions decreased the efficiency of PRIs for the estimation of the photosynthetic parameters; PRI(535,570) and PRI(545,570) had maximal efficiency under these conditions. (3) PRI(515,570) and PRI(525,570) mainly included the slow-relaxing component of PRI; in contrast, PRI(531,570), PRI(535,570), PRI(545,570), and PRI(555,570) mainly included the fast-relaxing component of PRI. These components were probably caused by different mechanisms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据