4.7 Article

Removal of Boron and Manganese Ions from Wet-Flue Gas DesulfurizationWastewater by Hybrid Chitosan-Zirconium Sorbent

期刊

POLYMERS
卷 12, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym12030635

关键词

boron adsorption; manganese ion adsorption; adsorption isotherms; column studies; desorption; biopolymer

资金

  1. Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education [BK_20]
  2. Rector's grant in the area of scientific research and development works Silesian University of Technology [04/010/RGJ19/0096]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Flue gas desulfurization (FGD) wastewater, after the alkaline precipitation and coagulation processes, often requires additional treatment in order to reduce the concentrations of boron and heavy metals below the required limits. In this study, we present an innovative and environmentally friendly method for boron and manganese removal that is based on a hybrid chitosan-zirconium hydrogel sorbent. The results from the batch adsorption experiment indicated that the uptake capacity for boron and manganese was equal to 1.61 mg/g and 0.75 mg/g, respectively, while the column study indicated that the total capacity of boron and manganese was equal to 1.89 mg/g and 0.102 mg/g, respectively. The very good applicability of the Langmuir isotherm at 25 degrees C suggested the monolayer coverage of the boron species onto the hybrid chitosan-zirconium hydrogel with a maximum adsorptive capacity of 2 mg/g. The amounts of boron and manganese in purified water could be decreased to less than 1 mg/dm(3) and 0.05 mg/dm(3), respectively, starting from the initial concentration of boron equal to 24.7 mg/dm(3) and manganese equal to 3.0 mg/dm(3) in FGD wastewater. Selective desorption of boron from the loaded bed was favorable when a NaOH solution was used, while manganese was preferentially eluted with a HCl solution. It is important to note that such an innovative method was investigated for the first time by testing borax recovery from wastewater in terms of an eco-technological perspective.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据