4.7 Article

Influences of graphene on microbial community and antibiotic resistance genes in mouse gut as determined by high-throughput sequencing

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 144, 期 -, 页码 1306-1312

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.09.076

关键词

Graphene; Gut microbiota; Antibiotics resistance gene; High-throughput sequencing

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51290282, 51278240, 21577061]
  2. Technology Support Project of Jiangsu Province [BE2013704]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20131270]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China [021114310018]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Graphene is a promising candidate as an antibacterial material owning to its bacterial toxicity. However, little information on influence of graphene on gut microbiota is available. In this study, mice were exposed to graphene for 4 weeks, and high-throughput sequencing was applied to characterize the changes in microbial community and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) in mouse gut. The results showed that graphene exposure increased biodiversity of gut microbiota, and changed their community. The 1 mu g/d graphene exposure had higher influences on the gut microbiota than 10 mu g/d and 100 mu g/d graphene exposures, which might be due to higher aggregation of high-level graphene. The influence of graphene on gut microbiota might attribute to that graphene could induce oxidative stress and damage of cell membrane integrity. The results were verified by the increase of ratio of Gram-negative bacteria. Outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria could reduce the membrane damage induced by graphene and make them more tolerance to graphene. Further, we found that graphene exposure significantly increased the abundance and types of ARGs, indicating a potential health risk of graphene. This study firstly provides new insight to the health effects of graphene on gut microbiota. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据