4.7 Article

Sorbent materials for rapid remediation of wash water during radiologkal event relief

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 162, 期 -, 页码 165-171

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.07.077

关键词

Radionuclides; Retention; Breakthrough; Vermiculite; Cesium; Montmorillonite

资金

  1. ORISE through HS-STEM summer internship
  2. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency through its Office of Research and Development
  3. Technical Support Working Group/Combating Terrorism Technical Support Office [92380201]
  4. Argonne, a U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science laboratory [DE-AC02-06CH11357]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Procedures for removing harmful radiation from interior and exterior surfaces of homes and businesses after a nuclear or radiological disaster may generate large volumes of radiologically contaminated waste water. Rather than releasing this waste water to potentially contaminate surrounding areas, it is preferable to treat it onsite. Retention barrels are a viable option because of their simplicity in preparation and availability of possible sorbent materials. This study investigated the use Of aluminosilicate clay minerals as sorbent materials to retain Cs-137, Sr-85, and Eu-152. Vermiculite strongly retained Cs-137, though other radionuclides displayed diminished affinity for the surface. Montmorillonite exhibited increased affinity to sorb Sr-85 and Eu-152 in the presence of higher concentrations of Cs-137. To simulate flow within retention barrels, vermiculite was mixed with sand and used in small-scale column experiments. The GoldSim contaminate fate module was used to model breakthrough and assess the feasibility of using clay minerals as sorbent materials in retention barrels. The modeled radionuclide breakthrough profiles suggest that vermiculite-sand and montmorillonite-sand filled barrels could be used for treatment of contaminated water generated from field operations. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据