4.5 Review

A Critical Period for Prefrontal Network Configurations Underlying Psychiatric Disorders and Addiction

期刊

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2020.00051

关键词

prefrontal networks; decision-making; critical period; ventral hippocampus; basolateral amygdala

资金

  1. ERC [322742-iPLASTICITY]
  2. Spanish Ministry of XXX [RTI2018-095698-B-I00, RTI2018-098269-B-I00]
  3. Proyectos de I+D+i desarrollados por grupos de investigacion emergentes [GV/2019/088]
  4. University of Valencia [664878]
  5. Juan de la Cierva [IJCI-2016-27758]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) has been classically defined as the brain region responsible for higher cognitive functions, including the decision-making process. Ample information has been gathered during the last 40 years in an attempt to understand how it works. We now know extensively about the connectivity of this region and its relationship with neuromodulatory ascending projection areas, such as the dorsal raphe nucleus (DRN) or the ventral tegmental area (VTA). Both areas are well-known regulators of the reward-based decision-making process and hence likely to be involved in processes like evidence integration, impulsivity or addiction biology, but also in helping us to predict the valence of our future actions: i.e., what is good and what is bad. Here we propose a hypothesis of a critical period, during which the inputs of the mPFC compete for target innervation, establishing specific prefrontal network configurations in the adult brain. We discuss how these different prefrontal configurations are linked to brain diseases such as addiction or neuropsychiatric disorders, and especially how drug abuse and other events during early life stages might lead to the formation of more vulnerable prefrontal network configurations. Finally, we show different promising pharmacological approaches that, when combined with the appropriate stimuli, will be able to re-establish these functional prefrontocortical configurations during adulthood.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据