4.7 Article

Rap1 and its effector RIAM are required for lymphocyte trafficking

期刊

BLOOD
卷 126, 期 25, 页码 2695-2703

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2015-05-644104

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) [GM055279, T32-GM007308, GM58801]
  2. National Cancer Institute (NCI) [P30-CA016087, U54-CA112967]
  3. NIH National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [P01-HL120846]
  4. Koch Institute Core [P30-CA14051]
  5. Ludwig Center at MIT
  6. Koch Institute Swanson Biotechnology Center

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Regulation of integrins is critical for lymphocyte adhesion to endothelium and trafficking through secondary lymphoid organs. Inside-out signaling to integrins is mediated by the small GTPase Rap1. Two effectors of Rap1 regulate integrins, RapL and Rap1 interacting adaptor molecule (RIAM). Using mice conditionally deficient in both Rap1a and Rap1b and mice null for RIAM, we show that the Rap1/RIAM module is not required for T- or B-cell development but is essential for efficient adhesion to intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM) 1 and vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM) 1 and for proper trafficking of lymphocytes to secondary lymphoid organs. Interestingly, in RIAM-deficient mice, whereas peripheral lymph nodes (pLNs) were depleted of both B and T cells and recirculating B cells were diminished in the bone barrow (BM), the spleen was hypercellular, albeit with a relative deficiency of marginal zone B cells. The abnormality in lymphocyte trafficking was accompanied by defective humoral immunity to T-cell-dependent antigens. Platelet function was intact in RIAM-deficient animals. These in vivo results confirm a role for RIAM in the regulation of some, but not all, leukocyte integrins and suggest that RIAM-regulated integrin activation is required for trafficking of lymphocytes from blood into pLNs and BM, where relatively high shear forces exist in high endothelial venules and sinusoids, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据